| The following are some of the responses to an email
sent to the members of the aifw
listserv in January 2008. |
The most difficult thing I find about being in an interchurch
family is... |
The thing I appreciate most about being in an interchurch
family is... |
- the feeling of having to defend my church's beliefs (at times)
|
- meeting Christians of other denominations and learning from their
faith walk.
|
- to respect the differences, and to learn about each other faith
|
- if we really care to see the good things instead of the weaknesses,
you will learn lots of things
|
- being keenly and consistently aware of church divisions which many
people don't notice and aren't bothered by
|
- the chance to participate with two very different parishes, both of
which we really enjoy.
|
- understanding the complexities of my husband's fierce belonging to
the Roman Catholic Church. Supporting over the past several years what
seems to me to be a relatively inactive style of belonging has somehow
felt less straightforward than supporting regular dual attendance and
involvement. But it's about support, isn't it?
|
- an enhanced mindfulness of the outsider. When in a Christian setting,
I try to speak and behave as though non-members of my community are
present and to be included.
|
- talking to other Christians in enough depth, including the clergy,
about our unity in Baptism and Marriage, as very often others just don't
have the experience to identify with our situation.
|
- that as our marriage has matured we have grown and matured ourselves
in our individual and shared faith, and this has deepened our love for
each other in its turn and enabled us to minister to others, not least
our children.
|
- the way same-church couples or fervent + agnostic are accepted easily
and we - interchurch families - are discriminated against/ treated differently
at God's table/ thought difficult/challenging
|
- the huge amount I have learned about my personal Christian faith and
my birth family's (URC+Anglican) and my worship family's (Anglican -
i.e. Church of England given where I live) through getting to understand
and learn about and learn from and enjoy and value the faith-traditions
of the actual spouse and her birth and worship family (Roman Catholic).
I honestly believe my faith and love of God would not be as rich and
as deep and as well-founded on the Rock as it has been due to my "marrying
out" and often therefore "playing away"! I also think
our children have benefited from being brought up in a family of Christian
first, church member second and lots of flexibility in that church membership,
without preconception that they "cannot be both"; as a matter
of reality they know they belong in the family of their mother and their
father and that we belong in each other's church family's too.
|
- feeling the 'maranatha' of Christian unity so much more keenly. "Here,
but not quite!" I guess that I feel the 'here' more than others
who still find what I consider to be artificial excuses to keep us all
apart ('not quite'). The awareness of the disjuncture is more apparent
to me because of my involvement with my wife's church. (As others have
said, if we kept just to ourselves, the ignorance would be blissful.)
|
- participating in the wonderful diversity of the very broad Christianity.
That diversity provides a great breadth and depth to our relationship
with God and each other that is just touched upon within any one denomitation.
You can't fully appreciate God from just one isolated vantage point,
and even within a 'unified' Christianity, the diversity still is/will
be a major portion of God's gift to us all.
|
- (From the 'adult child' of an interchurch couple)): As a kid, my siblings
and I would attend church twice on Sundays/holidays or some times 3
times if we went to youth group or were in the choir. You definitely
felt the pressure to choose between parents and attending their service,
not always from your parents but just as a kid.
My First Communion experience was difficult because my parents hadn't
decided how they wanted to handle the situation (whether I would do
it or not and when). It was such a specifically Catholic ritual and
rite of passage that I think it caught them off guard. I wished that
they had decided how they would handle significant religious points
in my childhood before I was of the First Communion age. For my brother
and sister, who came later, it was smoother.
People assume that I automatically chose one faith, either Catholic
or Episcopalian, to go with rather than sticking with both faiths. I'd
like to keep my "Interfaith-ness" and not have to choose one
church. I hated being labeled and have never gone through Confirmation.
|
- (From the 'adult child' of an interchurch couple): because of my interchurch
family I always felt comfortable and welcomed in any church. I appreciate
the similarities between my folks' churches. The prayers might have
had slight differences, or certain rituals were included or not, but
you learned to look for the differences or what makes each church unique
and enjoy them. For that reason I like going to different denominations
and experiencing a wide variety of services.
...my parents shared spiritual beliefs. My parents have very similar
spiritual and moral beliefs but pray in different buildings. They had
shared values and taught them through a shared Christian viewpoint.
|
- (From the parent of the above 'interchurch child') The "promise"
was not properly explained (or should I say completely read to us) and
Protestants have no "Promise" so we have to fend for ourselves
at a very young age. It is first presented to us in the presence of
our spouse-to-be and a priest ( so we feel outnumbered) with no sense
of having anyone behind us to give us any kind of support. I had a religion
that I wanted to share with my children. I had always been active in
my religion. I did not want my own children taken away from me in any
way.
When I asked about marriage preparation practices this year, my own
current Pastor told me that they just advise the couple that the child
should be raised in the tradition of the most devout of the two parents
to be. I had previously found out that the Catholic and Orthodox Churches
say that the children should be raised in one tradition; they are all
being taught the same things in their seminaries. How can any twenty
something year old couples make that decision? How would any pastor
decide who among their parishioners was the more devout? This kind of
pastoral care is setting the marriage up for failure. If I had known
about or if there had been your website at the time of our marriage,
I might have known that it was possible and preferable to raise children
in both traditions. We needed real life survival stories.
This concept even needs to be talked about in more depth because it
is ecumenical. This is very difficult for Catholics who have been taught
that the children must be raised Catholic. What is Christian Unity?
What does Vatican II really say? Denominations arose originally as a
political concept and in response to political concepts of church beginning
with Constantine in Rome. We talk about going back to the concept of
the early church prior to those times; that is a good idea. They were
pacifists. When interchurch couples get married, they are not thinking
about church history and that they will become a part of that history.
Right after that time, many of them are in a personal survival mode
and try to stay below the radar. Although 40 to 50% of all marriage
ceremonies in the Catholic Church each year are with other Christians
<in our country>, to my knowledge, no denominations, across the
board, are actively addressing the issues that interchurch couples will
face. Nor do they teach their extended families how to support them
or nurture them in an ecumenical way.
|
- (From the parent of the above 'interchurch child'): As interchurch
families, we are far more aware of church and what it means to us. We
study it on a very personal level. We go to church more often than most
families. We tend to go to many different kinds of churches. We become
ecumenical internally and to such a great depth that the average person,
even in our own churches, just doesn't understand this experience. Unfortunately,
we are rarely given the opportunity to share this experience with the
greater community. Although I think it would be a boost for
Christian Unity.
|
- having to deal with new clergy. Having to work out how to explain
our situation to them. Finding out whether they are willing to continue
to give us both communion.
|
- the friends we've made in other countries which has led us to being
more broad minded.
|